Team Tool: Must Wins They were a new team, with a leader new to the organization. They were a new team, with a leader new to the organization. They desperately needed to agree on the […]
Teams
Seize Privileged Moments
Do you find that sometimes you are heard, and other times you aren’t? Timing is key. When it’s sunny, who wants to buy an umbrella? Here, red10 ‘s Hazel Howard shared Cialdini’s “Pre-suasion” research on […]
Applying the Learning
The project team were celebrating their success and wanted the learning too. The standard “Worked Well / Better If” was okay, yet the real insights came when they asked the question: “What was supposed to […]
Are you shaping future business?
Are you aware of the equation of organizational survival? “For an organisation to survive, its rate of learning must be at least equal to the rate of change in its external environment”.
Because…
How often do we ask someone – very clearly – to perform a task for us and they don’t do it as we wanted? It may be the result we are disappointed with or the […]
Reaching 3rd loop learning
Has your team aligned on a vision and a set of priorities to achieve it? Are the priorities divided out, reporting back to keep on track? Then your team’s ready to reach 3rd loop learning […]
Viewing each other as aliens?
As part of our coaching series on ‘mindset’, 9D Coach Piers Carter here shares the red10 core belief: “Respect for the other person’s model of the world”.
Collaborating? Know yourself and flex accordingly
Imagine being in a collaboration – perhaps between departments in the same company, or perhaps between companies in an alliance. Do you feel all the weight of your department’s culture behind you, pressing you to […]
Building on that
Frustration was building for this team of experienced leaders. The backlog just kept growing; ideas weren’t turning into action. Here red10‘s Kirsten Campbell shares 3 practical techniques that are always useful, especially at times like […]
Thorny problem? Try Action Learning
Normal scientific debate tests new results and theories through attack and defence. This is the healthy process of peer review. But a different approach is needed when results are confusing or the problem seems thorny.